{
  "registry_version": "1.0.0",
  "data": {
    "title": "Portfolio / Work Artifact Misinterpretation",
    "status": "active",
    "evidence_ids": [
      "evidence.hidden_workers_untapped_talent_hbs_accenture"
    ],
    "content": "# Portfolio / Work Artifact Misinterpretation\n\nThe surface a screener opens does not show the candidate's architecture work, which sits in a non-standard repository layout or in contributions under another organisation.\n\n### Structural Context\n- **Actor:** `candidate`\n- **Nature:** `noise`\n- **Removability:** `candidate`\n\n### Causal Relations\n- Amplifies `mech.genuine_technical_skill_shortfall` — Genuine Technical Skill Shortfall\n\n### Non-Inferences\n- Misinterpreted architecture can be corrected through structured documentation.",
    "aliases": [
      "M-023"
    ],
    "id": "mech.portfolio_work_artifact_misinterpretation",
    "type": "mechanism",
    "summary": "The surface a screener opens does not show the candidate's architecture work, which sits in a non-standard repository layout or in contributions under another organisation.",
    "operates_at": [
      "bar.inbound_screening_triage",
      "bar.technical_screen_live_assessment"
    ],
    "emissions": [
      {
        "artifact": "obs.feedback_naming_as_absent_something_the_submitted_work_contains",
        "fidelity": "direct",
        "likelihood": "medium",
        "evidence": [],
        "observed_at": [
          "screening"
        ]
      },
      {
        "artifact": "obs.generic_closer_alignment_rejection_template",
        "fidelity": "euphemism",
        "likelihood": "high",
        "evidence": [
          "evidence.hidden_workers_untapped_talent_hbs_accenture"
        ],
        "observed_at": [
          "screening"
        ]
      },
      {
        "artifact": "obs.explicit_feedback_citing_skill_depth_shortfall",
        "fidelity": "distortion",
        "likelihood": "medium",
        "evidence": [
          "evidence.employment_interview_reliability_new_meta_analytic_estimates_by_structure_and_format"
        ],
        "observed_at": [
          "technical"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "facets": {
      "actor": "candidate",
      "nature": "noise",
      "visibility": "inferable",
      "removability": "candidate"
    },
    "amplifies": [
      "mech.genuine_technical_skill_shortfall"
    ],
    "masks": [],
    "evidence_level": "supported",
    "honest_baseline": false,
    "specimens": [
      {
        "kind": "note",
        "label": "What the screener saw and what was there",
        "lines": [
          {
            "text": "Screener note: mostly forks, little original work, no evidence of architecture ownership.",
            "tell": false
          },
          {
            "text": "The account: 3 pinned forks, and 40 commits over two years to an upstream project under a different org — including the storage layer rewrite referenced in the CV.",
            "tell": true
          }
        ],
        "reading": "The work exists and the surface that was checked does not show it. This is a discovery failure, and it is one of the few the candidate can fix directly."
      }
    ],
    "perspectives": [
      {
        "actor": "actor.candidate",
        "sees": "A rejection, or structured feedback naming a shortfall in an area the candidate has shipped work in.",
        "reads": "The work exists. What is not visible from here is which surface was opened and what it showed.",
        "does": "Restructures what is submitted: the relevant work pinned, the commits linked directly rather than the account, the ownership stated in the CV line rather than left to be discovered."
      },
      {
        "actor": "actor.recruiter",
        "sees": "A link and the minutes available for it, against an inbound volume larger than the week's screening capacity.",
        "reads": "The surface that opens is the profile. A page of forks reads as little original work, because what is not on it cannot be told apart from what does not exist.",
        "does": "Records the note from what the page showed and moves to the next application. That note travels forward as the evidence about the candidate's work."
      },
      {
        "actor": "actor.hiring_manager",
        "sees": "A shortlist and the screening notes attached to it, not the repositories themselves.",
        "reads": "Architecture ownership was checked and not evidenced, which is what the note in front of them says.",
        "does": "Spends the panel's time on the shortlist as delivered. Reopening a screened-out profile costs review hours the team is already short of."
      }
    ],
    "non_inferences": [
      "Misinterpreted architecture can be corrected through structured documentation."
    ],
    "agency_zones": {
      "candidate": "high",
      "recruiter": "high",
      "hiring-manager": "low"
    }
  }
}