{
  "registry_version": "2026.08.2",
  "data": {
    "title": "Conflicting feedback across different interviewers",
    "status": "active",
    "evidence_ids": [
      "EVD-006"
    ],
    "content": "# Conflicting feedback across different interviewers\n\nFeedback from one round praises architectural depth while another round claims insufficient technical background.\n\n### Diagnostic Non-Inferences\n- Does not prove bad faith; highlights lack of rubric calibration across the hiring committee.",
    "id": "A-014",
    "type": "artifact",
    "summary": "Feedback from one round praises architectural depth while another round claims insufficient technical background.",
    "stages": [
      "technical",
      "team"
    ],
    "evidence_level": "supported",
    "probes": [
      {
        "id": "PROBE-A-014-1",
        "action": "Request aggregated hiring rubric summary from talent partner.",
        "expected_signal": "Reveals whether team had misaligned internal evaluation criteria.",
        "cost": "low"
      }
    ],
    "non_inferences": [
      "Does not prove bad faith; highlights lack of rubric calibration across the hiring committee."
    ]
  }
}